Five key ingredients of Successful Strategy Formation – Interview with Patrick Haighton

Practitioners Corner

Patrick has advised CEO’s and their leadership teams on turnaround strategies in some of the worlds most successful companies including GE, Pitney Bowes, Standard Chartered Bank, and American Express.

In this interview, Patrick speaks about what he believes are the main ingredients of a good strategy.  He should know, he talks candidly about the transformation of Standard Chartered Bank started in the late 1980’s through strategy renewal designed by Patrick and his colleagues.  The culture essentials remain in place today and helped Standard Chartered Bank weather the financial storm that has recently wrecked such havoc on competitors.  Patrick also speaks openly and controversially about the management consulting industry. In addition, Patrick reveals his secret sauce for unearthing real value in the strategic evaluation process.

Patrick believes that strategy formation is only as good as its ability to be implemented.  Below we list his five key elements for successful strategy formation:

  1. Go back to the basic and fundamental purpose of the business and focus attention on the essential competitive necessities
  2. Build the strategy in conjunction with a clear understanding of the organisational culture – develop and match the two together
  3. Listening is critically important when performing a strategy evaluation.  This is not as easy as it sounds: taking the time to understand the meaning others are placing on the language they use, teasing out the core attributes and skills for success, identifying the connections that really matter, gradually filtering out and promoting the good ideas, discouraging others and discarding unnecessary complications
  4. Design for rigorous disciplines and standards to be applied to business fundamentals across the whole business and ensure these are implemented
  5. Reduce top-down strategy leadership to simple statements of intent and championship.  Build action steps from bottom up, encourage the ‘how-to’ ideas of people in the business.  Having well researched and heavily documented strategy at the board can and does have a numbing impact on strategy implementation, especially when it is not created within the organisation.

According to Patrick, “Strategy needs to be built with culture” He says he stumbled on this idea when coming at it from the perspective of developing a logical understanding business purpose.  He went on to say, “working back then, with executive responsibilities for strategic planning, I realized that things wouldn’t fly as expected but didn’t have practical answers as to why.  I was fortunate enough to meet someone who gave me the insight that strategy and organizational behavior are inextricably linked, and you have to work with both at the same time”.

Patrick’s view is that “Strategy is about understanding the fundamental purpose of a business”.  He feels that the real value of listening is the interviewers ability to put to one side any prior knowledge, expertise and understanding of an industry, and make people explain things in the simplest possible terms.  Patrick suggests that the freedom to be humble and ask basic questions produces some profound insights into what a business is really about, what really matters, why things are done the way they are, what the purpose is, and how the customer values what they get.

Very often, the daily complexities of running a business, get in the way of the original business objective. However, if you re-evaluate this situation in a very simple way and ask some very basic questions, you can get executive teams to rediscover the business fundamentals and actually simplify what they do, blowing away extraneous and irrelevant clutter.  Patrick’s enquiring mind and quiet confidence enables him to ask some deceptively simple but powerful questions such as:

  • How does this work?
  • Why does this happen?
  • How do you do that?
  • Why do you do that?
  • What technology makes that happen?
  • What have you created?
  • What can you do that no-one else can?
  • What are you proud of?
  • What do your customers think?

According to Patrick, “familiarity with a business protects it from in-depth executive team scrutiny and review“.  Questions probing below this radar, reveal unchallenged assumptions, and stop executives saying things like ‘come on, you must already know that’ – a blocking response that simply gets in the way of the executive thinking hard about the basics of the business.

I asked Patrick for his view of management consultants. Patrick observed that “this is an odd question to ask, because we are both management consultants, however, I have good reason to think that Top Tier Management Consultants are not good at implementing strategy.  Looking back over my own consultancy career, the best clients I have ever had, are the ones that I became involved with after they had invested in a McKinsey, Booz, or Bain led consultancy, had an incredibly well researched and documented strategy, put together and presented to the board in a massive and glossy tome, who then had not the slightest idea of what to do next”

Patrick went on to say that in his view, none of the big strategy consultancies are well suited to manage a strategic renewal process in practice. He suggested that the reasons for this was that the high-end consultancies have no real empathy with business managers, did not have particularly good, well honed, work-place people skills and certainly had little capability or interest in thinly spreading high priced consultancy resources in large organisations to make strategy implementation work.  Their economic model is built around teams.  Patrick’s view is that you do not need a consulting team for strategy implementation but instead, experienced leadership of managers in the organisation with an excellent ability to coordinate and cajole, supplemented with specialised training to handle change, “consultants lose track of flexibility and purpose in the management of strategic transformation – a combination of impatience for progress and patience to let things evolve is essential”

Patrick went on to say that “If you look at transformation efforts, you will see those that have gone well but plenty that have not. I was at Standard Chartered Bank for a five-year program that was arguably one of the most notable transformations within Financial Services.  Standard Chartered changed from a colonial model based on countries, to a global commercial super star with a very clear idea of what it was about. We introduced much improved banking and risk disciplines and applied these successfully and in a standard way across the world.   The financial problems that subsequently emerged during the financial crisis were, for the most part, avoided by Standard Chartered Bank, because such disciplines remain permanently embedded in its culture all these years later.

Patrick went on to describe the disciplines that were introduced into the bank;

“These disciplines were really very basic, for example, understanding credit decisions, understanding balance sheet management and understanding particular portfolio aspects of balance sheets – having a very profound view of how much or how little business you can do before it becomes an unbalanced risk in its own right.  These disciplines were applied in a consistent way across the world with single focused global responsibilities for the core businesses of the bank”.

“When we first got involved in Standard Chartered Bank in 1988, they had expanded beyond what their capital could support and independent survival was at risk.  We had to move fast in order to shed assets and bring the capital base back in line.  We sold buildings around the world to pump up the capital ratios, reduced exposures that threatened the stability of the balance sheet, sold businesses that were not significant to the core, and in a very detailed way, analysed what the bank was about in every region of the world.  We arrived at the view that it was a bank focused on international trade, particularly with China and South-East Asia and to a lesser extent with Africa and the Middle East – but beset by local variations and disjointed management.  For instance in India, 29 managers at various levels signed off corporate credit decisions which effectively meant that no one was taking loan book responsibility or managing loan risk.  We resolved this kind of issue and a myriad of others by focusing on a global commercial culture, clear lines of international responsibility and consistent operating standards and information flow for global products and services.

“We have developed culture mapping as a disciplined way of understanding behaviour.  It is an extremely good visual way of explaining the components of behaviour and how they inter-relate – without the need to explain the detailed preparation techniques or even how the conclusions were derived. This methodology allows quick recognition and buy-in from the management team focusing on the outcomes and the priorities”

I finished the interview by asking Patrick what secret sauce was?  His response? “being humble and very careful in the use of language, even the word “strategy” can and does, mean different things in different circumstances to different people, and very quickly, if you are not careful, you can end up having conversations at cross purposes.  I try very hard to use ordinary language, simply because of the real risk of misrepresenting words and meaning that have a particular cultural resonance with organisations and individuals.  We need to tread very carefully here.  Every organisation has its own language and you need to understand what they mean by the words they use.  It is unhelpful to come in with your own meaning for these words, or indeed to parade the methods, disciplines, processes and techniques which you use to help a client”.

According to Patrick, “my success as a consultant is measured by the success of my clients.  It does not matter if some of my recommendations do not get acted upon exactly as I envisage if in the process my client gets fired up to do something else that pursues the purpose effectively – it’s the outcome that matters most”.

Patrick is leading a new strategy service for Ennovate and can be contacted on +44 7974 352566.

Interviewed by Ian Duncan, Managing Director of Ennovate. Ian can be contacted on +353 86 3882499.

How to avoid change failure

Practitioners Corner: Mind the Gap from Change Design to Execution

As part of our first issue, we think it is very apt to discuss the challenges, traps and blind spots facing change and transformation leaders and map out the five things all change programmes need to do to avoid failure.  Our advice is applicable to all change programmes irrespective of size and scale, namely:

  1. Change the composition of the change team at the execution stage.
  2. Assess the change members belief and passion for the change goals.
  3. Introduce new management practices.
  4. Recognise and reward the right behaviours.
  5. Be guided by the vision and ideals when making change adjustments.

Transitioning from the design to execution phase is fraught with risk.   To start with, if you have created a comprehensive transformation strategy, it will include a strong and compelling vision, end state design, detailed plans and roadmaps and a solid project governance structure. You and your team will be feeling good and will probably have generated the essential momentum and demand for the next phase.  However, if you have not achieved these design outcomes, then you do need to revisit the situation and invest in getting the set-up conditions re-configured and properly rooted.

The next stage requires two significant steps. First, successfully on-boarding colleagues beyond the core project team and second, driving actions and getting relevant things done.  This is where a transformation programme gets a reality check.  We outline below, five key recommendations that address the issues that arise, in moving beyond the transformation design phase.

  1. Change the composition of the Change Team.   This may seem foolhardy, particularly if the design phase was a major success.  This counter-intuitive approach reflects the fact that many of the skills and competencies required to design a change programme, are no longer required once you move into execution.  In fact, one of the biggest risks is to continue to over invest in the analytical capability of the team and then expect that this team can and will deliver the change.  Change at the implementation stage, is about investing in the emotional management of change. It quickly becomes about doing and not about thinking.  Whilst it may appear easier or simply about getting lower level people involved, it is one of the most difficult aspects of change.  Bringing on-board pragmatic doers, and key influencers from the mid-levels within the organisation, requires discipline and skill. It needs good listening skills and the ability to coach and mentor. The change leader needs to win the hearts and minds of the extended team and transfer the passion that the leadership team possess for the change programme objectives, to the wider team and employee groupings.
  2. Assess the change members belief and passion for the change goals.  It is one thing to have the ability to design great change programmes, but what if the passion and commitment is not there for the implementation?  Some team members are more comfortable planning and designing.  Furthermore, they may see themselves as managers who do not have to rollup their sleeves and get stuck in.  Keeping such team members engaged is a mistake.  Transitioning into delivering requires the leaders and members of the change team to walk the walk.  If they do not feel passionate about the programme goals, vision and destination for the change programme, they will not be able to bring along the wider team.  Recognising this challenge and addressing it now, is important.  Either the team needs to develop conviction for the programme or accept they need to move on.  Most hired consultants don’t invest in the required passion, and therefore, most organisations simply don’t get this from their external partners.  As organisations move from planning to execution, it will prove timely to replace resources and invest in injecting passion, conviction and belief into the team.  We strongly advocate using diagnostic listening and Commitment-based Management as the basis for assessing and injecting passion into the team.
  3. Introduce new management practices. Once a change programme moves into the delivery phase, it requires a change to the project pattern and short-term rhythm and focus.  There is a requirement to shift the programme into getting things done.  The governance structures need to be reinvigorated.  The types of meetings, their frequency, content and structure, need to reflect a focus on getting things done and short-term outcomes.  Introduce high levels of personal accountability to deliver short-term action based results and track these actions through to completion.  Focus meetings on exceptional reporting. Do not tolerate those who deflect energy and determination to achieve the programme objectives or who are not forthright in coming forward and declaring a lack of progress.
  4. Recognise and reward the right behaviours.  Stay attuned with the progress of the programme and reward team members that get things done.  Knowing what needs to be done, should be replaced by doing what needs to be done.  Introduce real-time training and learning.  Do not punish those that are trying but failing. These team members need to be managed carefully to see if they can become competent or, if not, they need to be sympathetically and carefully moved off the programme.  By adopting this approach, change and transformation leaders will demonstrate they are ‘walking the walk’ and stand as exemplars for the behaviours of the change team.
  5. Be guided by the vision and ideals when making change adjustments.  Implementing change requires hard work to change people’s mind-set and perceptions.  There are winners, losers,  resistor’s and advocates.  Successful change implementation works through the impact on individuals.  Individuals transition through several psychological stages when changing.  Therefore, even well constructed plans can never predict with accuracy, the human aspect of change.  The practical question remains, when is it okay to adjust the plan and revise the end destinations?  There is no black and white answer, however, leaders should ask themselves, ’does such an adjustment undermine the overall vision or ideals that underpin the rationale for the programme?’ If the answer is yes, then the adjustments need to be re-examined and changed.

Change Management Explained

Implementing change is not a mystical art form that only belongs to executives, change leaders, and people with good emotional intelligence.  Successful change management is a systemised process that connects the organisation’s need to change with their employees individual ambitions. Change management programmes operate in three very distinctive stages, preparing for the change, managing the change and reinforcing the change.  Most large consulting organisations are adept in the preparation stage and are happy to execute change at a programme management level.  Getting close to individuals, developing assessment frameworks and coaching individuals through the change process is usually outside their scope.

Our Change Management service helps organisations undergo difficult and painful change, offering expertise to assess the change effort process, and providing assessment and coaching frameworks that get to the heart of change.

We help companies to articulate and communicate their vision and goals so that they connect with their staff.  Successfully leading and managing change touches all levels of an organisation, captivating the hearts and minds of all employees.  Our systemised hands-on approach will help you with the challenge to implement decisively, achieve the change objective, and get the commitment from your employees.

We can provide experienced change practitioners to lead, coach, and facilitate the change.

For further reading visit: www.ennovateconsulting.ie/change_management.html